Links
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(295)
-
▼
Mar 2010
(65)
- Self-Respect vs. Self-Esteem
- A Lunch Worth Having
- The Cartel
- Wilson on the Lust for Relevancy
- Passion Isn't Enough
- Just Read
- Holy Week
- No Mere Lip Service
- Final Four Time!
- An Inconvenient Wife
- On to the Elite Eight
- 10 Steps to Biblical Resistance
- Worth Reading a Second Time
- When Greed and Resentment Run the Law
- False Religion Leads to False Dichotomies
- The Reason for Evil
- Our Holy God
- They Speak, Will Anyone Listen?
- Evil Explained
- Politics is No Savior
- Not Fit to be Masters
- The Law of Unintended Consequences
- A Curious Scale of Values
- Round Two Complete
- The Day America Died
- Round One Complete
- When Killing Was Murder
- Victorianism by Another Name
- The Field is Set
- It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year
- Speaking More Truth to Power
- True Social Justice
- Not Long Now...
- Foreign Aid: A False Panacea
- Just Enough Truth
- Christianity Leads to Conservatism
- It's Dancin' Time!
- Recognizing Orwellian Doublespeak
- "Movie Title"
- The Gospel as Story
- Is Happiness a Reaction or a Choice?
- Waking Prince Rilian
- Happy Birthday, Chuck
- Government and Corporations Make Strange Bedfellows
- Welfare
- Healthy Patriotism vs. Sinful Exceptionalism
- Morality
- It's Coming!
- Dalrymple on Parenting
- This is Merely the Introduction
- Reading Well
- Global Warming Smackdown
- Today's Piltdown Man
- Expanding Abortion via Health Care
- Andrew Peterson
- Life: One Frame at a Time
- If...
- Keep the Gospel Central
- The Thin Line Between Humor and Cruelty
- The Black Genocide
- Intolerant Tolerance
- Republicans are Monsters!
- Ghost Church
- Mmm, Casserole!
- A Blessing and a Curse
-
▼
Mar 2010
(65)
Labels
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Dalrymple has an excellent article at InCharacter.org (which, by the way, is a "journal of everyday virtues"; sounds like something worth reading regularly) on the difference between self-respect and self-esteem.
When people speak of their low self-esteem, they imply two things: first, that it is a physiological fact, rather like low hemoglobin, and second, that they have a right to more of it. What they seek, if you like, is a transfusion of self-esteem, given (curiously enough) by others; and once they have it, the quality of their lives will improve as the night succeeds the day. For the record, I never had a patient who complained of having too much self-esteem, and who therefore asked for a reduction. Self-esteem, it appears, is like money or health: you can't have too much of it.
...
The problem with low self-esteem is not self-dislike, as is often claimed, but self-absorption. However, it does not follow from this that high self-esteem is not a genuine problem. One has only to go into a prison, or at least a prison of the kind in which I used to work, to see the most revoltingly high self-esteem among a group of people (the young thugs) who had brought nothing but misery to those around them, largely because they conceived of themselves as so important that they could do no wrong. For them, their whim was law, which was precisely as it should be considering who they were in their own estimate. It need hardly be said that this degree of self-esteem is certainly not confined to young thugs. Most of us probably suffer from it episodically, as any waiter in any restaurant would be able to tell us.
In short, self-esteem is but a division of self-importance, which is seldom an attractive quality. That person is best who never thinks of his own importance: to think about it, even, is to be lost to morality.
Self-respect is another quality entirely. Where self-esteem is entirely egotistical, requiring that the world should pay court to oneself whatever oneself happens to be like or do, and demands nothing of the person who wants it, self-respect is a social virtue, a discipline, that requires an awareness of and sensitivity to the feelings of others. It requires an ability and willingness to put oneself in someone else's place; it requires dignity and fortitude, and not always taking the line of least resistance.
...
Self-respect requires fortitude, one of the cardinal virtues; self-esteem encourages emotional incontinence that, while not actually itself a cardinal sin, is certainly a vice, and a very unattractive one. Self-respect and self-esteem are as different as depth and shallowness.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment