- ► 2011 (91)
- ► 2010 (295)
- The Cult of Celebrity
- Logic and Biblical Inerrancy
- Creed Sighting!
- Planned Parenthood Exposed
- Church Discipline Restoration Done Right
- Word(le) Up
- Josh Hamilton
- Just tried to go to my blog from Holiday Inn's com...
- Now THAT Was a Game to Behold
- A Scientist Takes on the Establishment
- A Dirge Without Christ
- Wilberforce on Humility
- If It Walks Like a Heretic...
- From Super Model to Humble Christian
- Repression Goes High Tech
- Blogging fun
- If It Sounds Like a Heretic...
- Christ Paid it ALL!
- Red Envelope Day
- The Morality of Convictions
- UFC: Ultimate Fighting Christ?
- The Demise of the Family
- Babel Comes into View
- Seeing Myself at the Cross
- "Do Not Casually Enter This Garden"
- Nuclear Weapons and Gun Control
- And Now for Something Completely Different
- Approaching Gethsemane and Golgotha
- Suffering Under Islam
- Orwell and Jokes
- Congress: Certifiably Retarded
- The Truth Project
- May They Not Have Died in Vain
- If Only We Had Universal Health Care...
- Assumed Abundance
- ▼ Apr 2009 (39)
- ► 2008 (116)
UPDATE: For those coming here from Tony Jones' link, his martyrdom is unfairly or dishonestly grasped. Jones: "But because I don't afford the penal substitutionary theory the status of crushing all other atonement theories, I've become the scourge of the Reformed blogosphere." It wasn't for this reason that I (or those other bloggers on his list of fellow "Edict" givers) mentioned him. I have no problem with saying that there are many correct and useful atonement theories. The Bible affirms this view. However, Jones didn't just lower the importance of penal substitution, he flatly DENIED it.
For years, the Emergent church leaders (Pagitt, McLaren, etc.) have done their very best to avoid talking doctrine or getting nailed down on any theological positions. But so far in 2009, it appears that they're turning over a new leaf. For the latest example, Tony Jones published this blog post on Good Friday. And it's not pretty...
One key to my understanding of the crucifixion is the beginning of Jesus' ministry. At about the age of 30, Jesus arrives at the Jordan River and is baptized by his cousin, John. He then retreats into the wilderness where, after a 40-day fast, he's tempted. Really tempted. That is, the result of Jesus' interaction with "the tempter" was not foreordained. Nor did Jesus know that he was divine in such a way that he wouldn't cave in to the temptations before him. Had Jesus been cognizant of his divinity, he would not have been truly tempted.
Some people today may find it compelling that some Great Cosmic Transaction took place on that day 1,980 years ago, that God's wrath burned against his son instead of against me. I find that version of atonement theory neither intellectually compelling, spiritually compelling, nor in keeping with the biblical narrative [emphasis mine].
Instead, Jesus death offers life because in Christianity, and in Christianity alone, the God and Creator of the universe deigned to become human, to be tempted, to reach out to those who had been de-humanized and restore their humanity, and ultimately to die in solidarity with every one of us. Yes, he was a sacrifice. Yes, he was "sinless." But thank God, Jesus was also human.
The hope he offers is that, by dying on that cross, the eternal Trinity became forever bound to my humanity. The God of the universe identified with me, and I have the opportunity to identify with him.
Today, and every day, I hang with him on that cross.