Links
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(235)
-
▼
Apr 2009
(39)
- The Cult of Celebrity
- Logic and Biblical Inerrancy
- Creed Sighting!
- Planned Parenthood Exposed
- Church Discipline Restoration Done Right
- Word(le) Up
- Motivations
- Josh Hamilton
- Just tried to go to my blog from Holiday Inn's com...
- Now THAT Was a Game to Behold
- A Scientist Takes on the Establishment
- Socialism
- Wordle
- A Dirge Without Christ
- Wilberforce on Humility
- If It Walks Like a Heretic...
- From Super Model to Humble Christian
- Repression Goes High Tech
- Blogging fun
- If It Sounds Like a Heretic...
- Christ Paid it ALL!
- Red Envelope Day
- The Morality of Convictions
- UFC: Ultimate Fighting Christ?
- The Demise of the Family
- Babel Comes into View
- Seeing Myself at the Cross
- "Do Not Casually Enter This Garden"
- Nuclear Weapons and Gun Control
- And Now for Something Completely Different
- Approaching Gethsemane and Golgotha
- Suffering Under Islam
- Orwell and Jokes
- Congress: Certifiably Retarded
- The Truth Project
- May They Not Have Died in Vain
- Ugh
- If Only We Had Universal Health Care...
- Assumed Abundance
-
▼
Apr 2009
(39)
Labels
Friday, April 03, 2009
George Will has an EXCELLENT piece this week on the "perils of a bright idea;" namely, politicians' mind-numbing responses to the global warming joke (a joke that unfortunately is on everyone, not just the mentally feeble in Congress). Will's case-in-point: the growing light bulb fiasco.
"Fervently" is how America will henceforth engage in talks on global warming. So said the president's climate change negotiator Sunday in Germany, at a U.N. conference on reducing carbon emissions. This vow was fervently applauded by conferees welcoming the end of what AP's news story called the Bush administration's "eight years of obdurate participation" in climate talks.
Reducing carbon emissions supposedly will reverse warming, if it resumes after the current period without warming, a period that began, according to statistics published by the World Meteorological Organization, 11 years ago.
...
Cynics will see only potential for mischief by governments, including the U.S. government, using such measures to give a green patina to protectionism. Meanwhile, the U.S. government is having its own problems with one "climate-friendly good" that might not be. Last week The New York Times front page carried this headline: "The Bulb That Saved the Planet May Be a Little Less Than Billed."
The story recounted some Americans' misadventures with the new light bulbs that almost all Americans -- all but those who are filling their closets with supplies of today's incandescent bulbs -- will have to use after the phaseout of today's bulbs in 2014. (You missed that provision of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007?)
...
[S]ome experts have written a guide saying the new bulbs require "a little insight and planning." The Times says that "may be an understatement."
The bulbs, says the Times, "do not do well in hot places with little airflow, like recessed ceiling fixtures," and some do not work "with dimmers or three-way sockets." And: "Be aware that compact fluorescents can take one to three minutes to reach full brightness. This is not a defect." Well, if you say so. Because all fluorescents contain mercury, a toxic metal, they must never be put in the trash, so Home Depot and other chains offer bins for disposing of dangerous bulbs. Driving to one of these disposal points might not entirely nullify the bulbs' environmental benefits. Besides, the Times summarizes the Environmental Protection Agency's helpful suggestions for coping with the environmental dangers caused when one of these environment-saving bulbs breaks:
"Clear people and pets from the room and open a window for at least 15 minutes if possible. Avoid vacuuming. Scoop up larger pieces with stiff paper or cardboard, pick up smaller residue with sticky tape, and wipe the area with a damp cloth. Put everything into a sealed plastic bag or sealed glass jar. In most cases, this can be put in the trash, but the EPA recommends checking local rules."
Worrywarts wonder what will happen when a lazy or careless, say, 10 percent of 300 million Americans put their worn-out bulbs in the trash. Stop worrying. What do you think? That Congress, architect of the ethanol industry and designer of automobiles, does not think things through?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Yeah, I don't know if you've noticed this or not, but Walmart has recently joined in to try to sell fluorescent bulbs. There is a commercial I just saw yesterday. It says something about how many millions of Walmart shoppers there are in the world and how much of an impact it would make if they all started using fluorescent bulbs. I don't know if it specifically mentions global warming. It may be geared toward saving energy worldwide or something. Either way, its a way for them to take advantage of the global warming industry, even if they avoid using the more controversial language.
Post a Comment