Links
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(141)
-
▼
Dec 2007
(9)
- Merry Christmas!
- Stop Global Warming, Become a Coach Potato
- Creation as Science and Evolution as Religion video
- The Assault on Families
- Presidential survey
- Scientists with a clue (and a spine)
- Global Warming Politics = Loss of Freedom
- Coincidence?
- From Khartoum to Sydney to Hanover, the spirit of ...
-
▼
Dec 2007
(9)
Labels
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Today's article on Zeal for Truth is pretty good, so you should read it.
Global warming is perhaps the most discussed “global” issue in news media today. Turn on the radio, television, or hop onto the internet and somehow the issue of global warming is waiting to be debated or touted as the impending crisis of the 21st century. However, the real crisis behind the issue of global warming is freedom.
Never mind that global warming proponents would like to control your car, where and how often you drive, how much energy you consume, where you live, and all things livestock related, society nods their head and tips their hat to such notions. After all, no one really minds as long as these are suggestions or “encouragements.” Enthusiasts discuss their ideas and most people replace at least one light bulb in their house.
...
Stop to consider for a moment what would happen if these aforementioned “encouragements” became law. How these laws would be enforced? The only way to enforce climate change laws is to restrict the freedom of individuals. Once a suggestion becomes law, the choice to comply is removed or rather, it is becomes a non-choice of compliance or penalty. Perhaps many people would not mind small penalties for using non-incandescent bulbs in their homes. In fact, most people don’t mind that cars are mandated to be more fuel efficient. Yet, the philosophy behind global climate change legislation is dangerous. The implication behind the “need” for such laws is that of removing the choice from individuals and giving control to governing authorities.
It grows immediately more concerning when such ideas potentially impact entire families on a personal level. Recently, politicians and professors in both Australia and Britain suggested that population control and baby carbon taxes should be strongly considered.
...
The viewpoint of regulating individual actions is based on the idea that others have the right and responsibility to control your choices and penalize you accordingly. It goes beyond choosing to calculate your carbon footprint to deciding who has a right to reproduce and breathe air. It assumes that life is owned by a collective group of strangers rather than one’s self.
“While every individual should be cherished, mankind’s reproduction is akin to the replication of a virus. We are swamping the planet and devouring its resources.”-North West England MEP, Chris Davies
The first loss of personal freedom may just be a light bulb, or car, however it when carried further it will inevitably lead to the marginalization of the natural rights to life and liberty and possibly the loss of both.
Labels:
Freedom,
Global warming
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
sort of fits hilary clintons book title about taking a villiage eh? also - what bothers me is the lack of measurable outcomes for enforcing climate change. Can a person's impact on climate really be quatifiable? yes - we can measure how much carbon footprinting I do - but we cannot correlate that measurement with measurements of climate change - especially not on an individual level - which is the level that laws intrinsically address. It would be basing laws on hypothesis. That's scary.
also - i totally should've done ace ventura! what a great suggestion - perhaps next time :-]
p.s. have you ever heard of the book "the missing class". i saw a pbs special on it. was wondering if you read it and had any thoughts on it.
the end.
Post a Comment