Links
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(295)
-
▼
May 2010
(31)
- A Root Cause of Poverty
- Frame the Debate
- Lack of Imagination
- Happy Heresy Hunting, Part 2
- The Bechdel Test
- Happy Heresy Hunting
- Repeal the Civil Rights Act?
- Does it Pinch?
- Growtivation
- Advancing the Plot
- Further Cuts Will Follow
- It's About the Object of Our Faith
- Take it and Go Away
- When Envy Drives Economy
- What Would Jesus Boycott?
- Americans are So Individualistic... Or are They?
- The Truth is Getting Out
- A Sex Symbol Tries to Put the Genie Back in the Bo...
- The Other Kind of Porn
- Great Prayer of Corporate Repentance
- A Soul Shrivels
- No You Didn't
- Feathers
- Faith versus Works
- The Sun Also Rises
- Virtuous Essays
- Shack Up With Jesus
- Everywhere a Moral Cause
- If Only Politicians Were All This Smart...
- Dalrymple on the Problem of a Mastodonic Mankind
- Kill the Dragon
-
▼
May 2010
(31)
Labels
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Here is a great interview with Dr. Willie Soon, a solar and climate scientist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Examiner.com: What is your opinion of the anthropogenic (man-caused) global warming theory?
Dr. Soon: It’s never been about the science – even from the very beginning. It’s based on confusion and a mixture of ideology. We should deal only in the facts that we do know.
Examiner.com: Many of the scientists promoting the global warming theory appear to be driven by politics rather than hard scientific data. What are your thoughts?
Dr. Soon: I am a scientist. I go where the facts take me. And the facts are fairly clear. It doesn’t take very long to discover that their views [of man-caused global warming] aren’t grounded in the facts. Why would any solid science need so much promotion and advertisement and the endless shouting about how the science has all been “settled”? And now we’re supposed to believe that the growing consensus on the street that humans are not responsible for global warming is due mainly to the confusion created by climate “deniers.”
...
Examiner.com: What needs to be done to combat the strong-arm tactics being used against scientists who disagree with the AGW theory?
Dr. Soon: Science needs to stand up. The AGW movement is killing science. It’s very unhealthy in many ways. They are corrupting science for material gain. It’s time for us to take back climate science.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
How does Dr. Soon define the "very beginning." Knowledge of the existence of the greenhouse effect goes back at least to Fourier in the 1820's. Understanding of CO2 as an important contributor to global warming and the possibility of humans influencing climate can be traced to S. Arrhenius in 1894 http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/Arrhenius/arrhenius.php
Post a Comment