Links
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(235)
-
▼
Feb 2009
(18)
- How to Read and Write Good
- These Irrational Times
- Now THAT'S a Hobby!
- Theological Florist
- Watch Where You Step!
- Bigger British Brother
- Devos and Dinner
- As Easter Approaches
- Samir Kuntar
- With All Creation
- The Racism and Cowardice of Multiculturalism
- Remarkable Irony
- Legal but Rare?
- An Irrational Age
- Criminal Justice Crumbles
- M4GW
- Boom, Roasted!
- The Truth About Wal-Mart
-
▼
Feb 2009
(18)
Labels
Monday, February 16, 2009
Imagine if someone told you in 19th century America that he was not interested in giving slaves full citizenship, but merely reducing the number of people brought to this country to be slaves. But suppose another person told you that he too wanted to reduce the number of slaves, but proposed to do it by granting them the full citizenship to which they are entitled as a matter of natural justice. Which of the two is really “against slavery” in a full-orbed principled sense? The first wants to reduce the number of slaves, but only while retaining a regime of law that treats an entire class of human beings as subhuman property. The second believes that the juridical infrastructure should reflect the moral truth about enslaved people, namely, that they are in fact human beings made in the image of their Maker who by being held in bondage are denied their fundamental rights. - Francis Beckwith
Labels:
abortion
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment